The online magazine on the history and operation of vintage scale model trains in American OO gauge

Saturday, October 28, 2017

A closer look at two etched zinc cars

A recent arrival was an example of an early, pre-war boxcar by Oscar Andresen. I have now several of these cars, and there is some comparison to be made between this boxcar and the stock car, which was previously described in this article. 

One of the most interesting comparisons for me is you can see how the stock car has the outside ribs, and the boxcar does not. This is something that the builder was to add.

Backing up a step though, note the raised Rock Haven lettering on the boxcar. Except for my stock car every one of his models I have ever seen has the raised lettering for one of his personal roads. His idea I believe was that you would touch the raised lettering with paint different than the background paint, in those days when decals were a novelty. However, I can see how the stock car should have lettering as well, matching an identical car owned by Jack Bartman (as posted in the American OO Facebook group). The Mohawk Valley 8502 lettering was sanded off by the builder – which is understandable, if your home road is not the Mohawk Valley.

I only have one boxcar door and I marvel at how light and delicate the zinc etching is. It is as thin as though it was stamped brass, but the material is lighter.

On the other hand, the boxcar is a bit curious, as it is clearly an outside braced car but there are no horizontal boards visible. Was his idea being it was a plywood car? Or steel?

The stock car has no frame, but the Nason frame seen on the boxcar is a good choice.

The boxcar also has a cast aluminum Nason roof walk, from the cast Nason boxcar. That being there is a lucky find, as I was lacking that part for my boxcar casting project. So, I will be taking that off and making a mold soon.

The bigger picture thing is the topic of actually finishing one of these cars. I would like to finish the stock car, actually, using salvaged S-C doors. The big problem is cleaning it for painting, which I will just have to carefully tackle at some point. Hopefully I can get that corrosion off with a Q-tip and care.

Saturday, October 21, 2017

A look at the new American OO FA-1 on Shapeways

Those who look at the American OO Scale group on Facebook already know, there is a new 3D printed model of the Alco FA-1 available now on Shapeways (here).

Back when I worked in HO (I was still active in a local HO club after I started in OO) I regularly ran a Train Miniatures FA-1 with a dummy F-7 diesel, painted for my Orient. I always enjoyed the pair visually, and ordering this model I am looking to do that same type of combination of EMD/Alco cab units together, but this FA-1 will be the dummy. In this first photo, the Shapeways FA is with my original HO FA, and in the final photo the OO FA-1 is with a F-3. Visually, the 3D printed body has the shape we want, it really is a sight for sore eyes for the OO gauger. But the steps are a bit fragile and there are other issues and limitations to be aware of.

Having now three other diesels with Shapeways bodies (more here), I would rate this body a bit better than the others but be aware, these are not as detailed as the average train set engine in HO. The biggest issues with all of them is the overall rough, grainy finish, with a close second being the “wood grain” effect on the roof due to the 3D printing process. This second photo was taken without a flash to highlight the issue, which is a remnant of the production process. It is more visible if you click on the photo for a closer view. I will try to sand some of that off.

Another issue will be painting. From experience, I know the recommendation is to use acrylic paint and that the paint soaks into the surface of the model. If you were thinking about a multi-color scheme it probably won’t turn out well. A solid, darker color would be the best choice, if for no reason but to obscure the low detail level. I will try red on this model and will hope for the best. (I did see a suggestion somewhere to paint with a primer first and then a clearcote finish before putting on the desired color. This seems like a good idea.)

As noted in the (now updated) Fleischmann FA article in this site, a FA body should be about a foot and a half longer than that of a F-3, and this Shapeways model has that relationship to the Schorr F-3. But that brings up the Fleischmann FA and this photo comparing the two. Basically, the Fleischmann model is an attractive one and in ways certainly better detailed than the Shapeways model. But also, the Fleischmann model is underscale for OO. It was marketed as HO but is larger – but visually not as big as the Shapeways model, it is about half way between HO and OO in size. In short, the Fleischmann model looks OK converted to OO operation but you could not run it with the Shapeways model.

The new model comes with 3D printed truck sideframes. Personally I don’t think they are very usable. I have a spare pair of Schorr RS-2 trucks which will be used at least initially on this model. If I were not using them, I would likely use the Tyco/Mantua HO sideframes that show up on a number of their models but in particular the C-430 and the Baldwin Shark. Those have the correct wheelbase for OO with much sharper detail than the Shapeways sideframes. All three types are seen in the photo.

To close, I spotted one more new 3D printed 1/76 diesel, a GP-20. It looks like the detail level is again not real sharp, but it would build up into a well-proportioned model for sure. For me I probably have enough diesels for now, and I have in particular my eyes on several of my steam locomotive projects as things I will be working on in the near future. But if you are thinking diesels, give Shapeways a look, if it is there in any scale contact the designer of the model, they may be willing to make the changes so that it can be produced in American OO.


Sunday, October 1, 2017

Looking back on 40 years working in American OO

A recent note from Jack B. asked about how it felt to look back on 40 years in American OO. 40 YEARS!!! Checking in my files he was absolutely right, I purchased my first Eastern OO kit in August of 1977, and began corresponding with Temple Nieter, who encouraged me greatly, starting in November of 1977. I was only 15 (!!) at the time, having built a small layout in HO and also having dabbled in TT. Oh my, time flies. I had discovered OO originally in an old model railroading book that belonged to my older brother. This forgotten gauge intrigued me.

Temple Nieter referred to himself and others like him who got going in American OO when it was still commercially available as “OOdtimers.” Basically, they had got going in OO then, why switch? In the context of 2017 I am now an OOldtimer for kind of the same reason, I developed a level of expertise and like the size, feel, and history of the scale. And also, there's that part of me that does not want to do what everyone else is doing I guess.

I was not working on models actively when I was in grad school and in the early years of marriage and kids. But I did keep everything and picked back up where I left off. The models seen in the photo here are among my very earliest, the freelanced Fall River boxcab being my first OO locomotive, built up mostly from HO parts (the body started life as a Athearn F7B, the drive and other parts are from an AHM RS2), and that Eastern boxcar is my very first car, built from a fresh kit purchased directly from Eastern (which was still in business then). I also posted a video of a group of my early models in operation in the American OO Facebook group (here). As seen there, my main freelanced line has always been the Orient, I started building HO models for it before I got into OO (more on the Orient here).

I have enough projects to keep me busy for the next 20 years for sure, and part of what keeps me going is puzzling over projects and history. Like the truck project that became a summer goal for example (more here), I had a lot of S-C truck parts that could not be used really for lack of bolsters, then the 3D ones come out and boom. At one point about ten years ago I was down to just a few usable pair of trucks! Now I have put most of the usable parts to good use and have enough to last me that 20 years I bet.

Of course, the argument could be made that I could puzzle over projects in any scale, but OO does suit me. I’m not a fine scale modeler, I like the type of modeling I loosely call “retro modeling.” And learning new skills has been fun, such as casting in resin this past summer (more starting here).

As to goals, I hope to start back up the history series again (I have notes ready to start working on the 1960s) and take it up to today, then start back in on working toward a book of some sort, on OO. The big picture goal being to write something that is accurate but not boring, looking at the people in the scale in particular, and hopefully written in such a way that people who are interested in the history of model railroading in general would find it a good read.

In any case, yes, it has been 40 years. Wow. Hopefully 40 years from now there will still be some people still interested in our mostly forgotten scale.